Capacity and Consumer Protection Law

Question: Discuss about the Capacity and Consumer Protection Law. Answer: Introduction A valid formation of contract can be established by two or more parties who intent to define their obligations in the form of a document. A contract can be oral or written or unilateral or bilateral, but, whatever may be its form, there are few essentials which must always be present. They are offer, acceptance, legal intention, capacity and consideration to make any contract enforceable in law. All the contract essentials are very important and no valid contract can be formed in the absence of any single contract element. The present essay has made an attempt to define what consideration is and what a valid consideration is, that is, it must be adequate or it must be sufficient? Through this essay it is analyzed that a consideration need not to be adequate but it must be sufficient to make any contract enforceable in law. Thus, it is first important to define a consideration. Consideration When there are promises which are exchanged amid the promisor and the promisee, then, the price or gain that is sought by the promisor for his promise is called consideration. Thus, it is the price to support the promise. In Australia, to make a binding contract amid the parties, the consideration must be provided by the promisee to the promisor to support the promise that is provided by the promisor. A consideration is considered to be valid provided there are two essentials which must be present: In Currie v Misa, it was submitted that a consideration can only be considered to be valid when it is beneficial to the promisor or is detrimental to the promisee in one form or another. At times, promise given against a promise is also regarded as a valid consideration provided it is either beneficial or detrimental in nature. The benefit to the promisor or the detriment to the promisee must be against some kind of promise or against some kind of price. There must be presence of quid pro qu or some kind of bargain or exchange amid the parties and is held in Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v Commonwealth. Thus, consideration is the price which is provided by a promisor to the promisee for the promise so made. Consideration can be monetary or non-monetary, but, the only requirement is that there is some detriment that is caused to the promisee against which the promisor is paying some kind of benefit to the promisee. It is not necessary that there should be some kind of benefit which must be received to the promisor. Thus, a valid consideration must move from the promisee. However, it is now important to understand as when a consideration is considered to be valid. Whether the consideration should be sufficient or it has to be adequate to consider it as valid? In order to understand the true nature of consideration, it is important to understand some basic terminologies. Nominal consideration In Thomas v Thomas, the concept of nominal consideration was evaluated and explained. In the given case, the deceased husbands executor was sued by the widow. It was stated that when her husband was dying then at that time he, in the presence of the witnesses, submitted that it is his wish that his wife must have one of the houses for life. The executors, on the death of the husband, has conveyed interest in one of the house considering it as the last desire of the husband provided 1 pa rent must be paid by the widow and she must keep the premises in good condition. But, later the executor refused to honor the last wish of the husband. It was held by Denman CJ that moral feelings of the husband are not a good consideration. Rather, the rent and the provisions of repairs is good consideration in the eyes of law. As per Patteson J, a consideration is valid only when there is some kind of benefit and some kind of detrimental effect and must have some value in the eyes of law, even if such value is nominal. So, the wish of the testator is not a valid consideration but the rent and repair provisions are sufficient even if the consideration is nominal. Thus, the courts have given regard to the concept of nominal consideration. Illusionary consideration Generally, whenever a contract is established amid two parties then the basic rule which must be followed is the rule of caveat emptor, that is, let the buyer beware. The buyer is at a position to look at all the pros and cons of the deal prior finalizing the same. Thus, the courts are normally reluctant to interfere and to consider whether the contract that is established amid the parties is a good deal or not. As already submitted, anything which is determined by the promisor is consideration. The only requirements are that it is not illegal and must have some value in the eyes of law. Thus, can it be submitted that consideration has to be real and it is not necessary that it must be adequate. In Biotechnology Australia Pty Ltd v Pace, Pace was employed by Biotechnology and it was agreed that Pace is entitled to participate in one of the schemes of the company. However, there was no such scheme at the time or during the time when Pace was employed. Pace sued the company for breach of contract. It was held by the courts that a consideration is considered to be illusionary when the payment of it depends upon the description of the promisor and such illusionary consideration is invalid in law. The court held that the introduction of the scheme is totally within the discretion of the company and is illusionary and illusionary consideration is invalid in law. Inadequate consideration Now, what is adequate or what is inadequate consideration is discussed in Woolworths Ltd v Kelly. It was held that normally courts do not look in to the adequacy of the consideration. What is adequate for one person might not be adequate for other persons. Thus, it makes no difference whether the consideration is adequate or not, however, it must not be illusionary or illegal. Sufficient consideration A consideration is said to be valid when it is sufficient. It is necessary that every consideration must be detrimental to the promisee and must provide some benefit to the promisor. However, a consideration must have some value in the eyes of law, that is some material or economic value. It is not necessary that the consideration must be of great value, rather, a consideration is valuable even if a promise is reciprocated by another promise, for example, in Alliance Bank Ltd v. Broom, a promise not to sue was held to be a valid consideration provided the claim is reasonable, the caches of claim to be successful is high, there is no concealment of facts. Thus, a consideration is valid even if it is not adequate but is sufficient to support the promise. The analysis of all the terms makes a point clear that a consideration is valid provide it is sufficient in the eyes of law and it makes no difference whether the same is adequate or not. This is the main theme of the present essay and is evaluated with the help of leading case laws. Consideration need not be adequate or commercially realistic. It merely needs to be sufficient. A consideration is valid provided it is determined by the promisor. A valid consideration should not be illegal in the eyes of law, rather, should have some value which proves that consideration exists. In Chappel v Nestles, the Nestle Company has declared that if people send 3 wrappers of the chocolate bar along with the postal order of 1 shilling within six days then they will be provided with a record. It was submitted by the House of Lords that even though the wrappers has no monetary value but the promise by the company and the repeated action by the promisee amounts to good consideration making the promise enforceable in the law. It was submitted by the judge that pepper corn is still considered to be a valuable consideration in the eyes of law even when the promisor is not interested in pepper and throw the corn. Thus, even if the consideration is not adequate still the same is considered to be valid because it was sufficient enough to keep the promise made by the promisor open for a specific period of time. In Woolworths Ltd v Kelly, Kirby J has submitted that there is no need for the consideration to be adequate because what is adequate for one might be inadequate for another. Thus, a consideration has to be sufficient and not necessarily adequate. In Thomas v Thomas, the nominal amount of rent and the promise to keep the premises in good condition was held to be sufficient consideration to make the promise of the promisor enforceable in law. In Wigan v Edwards, the defendant agreed to sell his house to P @ $15,000. However, before the sale can be finalized, P submitted that there are defects in the house and thus is not intended to proceed further. In order to proceed with the sale, the defendant further promised to P that if there will be any faults within five years of sale, then, it is the defendants responsibility to cure them. But, when there is a presence of bonfide compromise of a disputed claim which is believed by the promisor to exist and any promise to resolve such dispute (even when the duty is an existing duty) is a good consideration in the eyes of law even when such consideration is not adequate and is only a sufficient consideration. In Butler v Fairclough, it was held that a promise made not to sue the promisee for a specific time limit is a valuable and sufficient consideration provided there is a bona fide claim and there is presence of liability. But, forgiving a claim when there is no bona fide claim or liability is not a valuable or sufficient consideration in the eyes of law. In Pinnel's Case, The defendant was sued by P on bond. However, the defendant submitted that P had agreed to accept 5 2/6d on 1 Oct against 8 10s which is due on 11 Nov. It was submitted by the court that when a party pays a less sum of money on the day when it was due, then, it cannot be submit that it is given in satisfaction of the whole amount of money. But, if a part of the money is paid before the due date then it can be regarded as a good consideration for the whole amount. Thus, payment of less money prior to due date is sufficient consideration for the whole amount. In Couldery v Bartrum (1880), it was held that if the creditors decide to take the fewer amounts in settlement of the full claim then it is sufficient consideration to honor the agreement amid the parties. In Dunton v Dunton the defendant has agreed to pay to his wife 6-00 per month, provided, his wife will remain sober and act with virtuous, respectful and orderly manner. It was held by the court that the promise by the promisor is supported by the detrimental effect of the promisee as she is giving away her liberty and this can be considered as a sufficient consideration even though the consideration is not adequate in the eyes of law. In Ward v Byham, it was agreed by the father that he will provide 1 per week maintenance to the mother of the child only on the condition that the mother will look after the child adequate and will keep him happy. It was held by Denning MR that the consideration provided by the father may not be adequate but is sufficient to keep the act of the mother going and is thus a valid consideration in the eyes of law. Thus, from all the cases which are analyzed above it is submitted that in order to make a valid consideration it must have some value in the eyes of law even though it is not adequate. Also, the consideration must not be illegal or illusionary though a nominal consideration is also valid in the eyes of law. Now, it is important to understand the difficulties that exist with the current law of consideration. Existing Issues on the law of consideration As already discussed that a consideration is valid if it is sufficient, even though the same is not adequate in nature. However, the approach of the courts has found to be contrasting in nature. In Chappel case, the chocolate wrappers are considered to be sufficient consideration. Likewise in Ward v Byham case, the money provided to keep the child happy was also held to be sufficient consideration to enforce the promises amid the parties. But, in the leading case of White v Bluett[29], a promise made to refrain the other party from complaining is found not to be sufficient consideration. Thus, what is recognized in the cases of Chappel Ward v Byham was not recognized in White v Bluett. Thus, the approach which is undertaken by the courts is not same which brings difficulty in understating the actual concept that revolves around the principle of adequacy and sufficiency of consideration[30]. Also, it is very difficult to understand as what actual a practical benefit is which is found in Williams v Roffey Bros case. It was discussed by Phang LJ that when there is promise to gave more can be considered as practical benefit then why not the principle is extended to when there is a promise to pay less. These problems that are raised have evolved an issue regarding the adequacy of the Principe of consideration in its present form. However, disregarding the issues that are raised, the importance of the principle of consideration can be shed away. Conclusion To conclude, it is submitted that the consideration as one of the elements in the formation of contract is very important. It makes the contract enforceable and provides an indication that the parties intent to honor the promises that are exchanged amid them. And the act or forbearance by the promisee is supported by some kinds of benefit which has the sanctity in the eyes of law. Further, the consideration that is provided must be sufficient and have presence in the eyes of law regardless of the fact whether it is adequate or not. The adequacy of consideration is not important because what is adequate or one person might be irrelevant for another. The only thing that is relevant is sufficiency of the consideration. Thus, even a nominal consideration was held to be valid provided the same is not illusionary or illegal in nature. Thus, it is correct to submit that Consideration need not be adequate or commercially realistic. It merely needs to be sufficient in nature. Reference List FJR Caelum, 2013, Case Brief. Goldring et al, 1998, Consumer protection law, Federation Press. Julie C, 2015, Australian Contract Law, Consideration. LA Bygrave, consideration, 2013, JUS5260 Spring 2013 Consideration . M Furmston G.J. Tolhurst, Contract Formation:Law and Practice, 25-Mar-2010, OUP Oxford. R Moles B sangha, Consideration - in Acceptance of Contract 1998. The LawHandBook (2015) Elements of contract. Unistudyguide, 2012, Elements of consideration. Alliance Bank Ltd v. Broom (1864). Australian Woollen Mills v The Commonwealth (1954) 92 CLR 424. Beaton v McDivitt (1987) 13 NSWLR 162. Butler v Fairclough (1917) 23 CLR Biotechnology Australia Pty Ltd v Pace (1988) 15 NSWLR 130. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893]. Coulls v Bagots Executor Trustee Co Ltd (1967) 119 CLR 460. Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153. Dunton v Dunton (1892) Pinnel's Case (1602) R v Clarke(1927). Thomas v Thomas (1842). Tutorhunt, should consideration be abolished?, 2017. Ward v Byham [1956] Woolworths Ltd v Kelly (1991) 22 NSWLR 189. White v Bluett(1853) 23 LJ Ex 36 Wigan v Edwards (1973) 47 ALJR 586.

Pharmacology for Dopamine and Neurotrnsmitter- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about thePharmacology for Dopamine and Neurotrnsmitter. Answer: Abstract Parkinsons disease is a long-term degenerative disorder in which the main effect is on the central nervous system of the body. The present video is on Parkinsons disease which mainly focuses on the pharmacological principles of managing the condition. A discussion is also put up regarding the pathophysiology of the disorder, relevance to practice and other considerations. The central nervous system is responsible for maintaining the chemical environment within the body for normal living processes. Parkinsons disease is marked by death of cells in the brain and the presence of Lewy bodies which are accumulations of protein alpha-synuclein. The basal ganglia exert a constant inhibitory influence on motor system with the help of dopamine, a neurotrnsmitter, controlling their activation. In case of Parkinsons disease, there are low levels of dopamine, leading to production of hypokinesia and reduction in motor output. Pharmacological treatment of Parkinsons disease focuses on the restoration of required level of dopamine in the brain. The drugs that are commonly administered for treating the symptoms of the disease are L-DOPA, dopamine agonists, Monoamine Oxidase B inhibitors, Amantadine, Anticholinergics and Catechol O-Methyl Transferase Inhibitors. L-DOPA is the main class of drugs used which is commonly known as Levodopa. It is a metabolic precursor of the catecholamine neurotransmitter dopamine. It is responsible for replenishing the depleted striatal dopamine. The pharmacokinetics is highly satisfactory. The drug is mainly administered orally. However, there are a number of side effects presented by the patient such as drowsiness, insomnia, agitation, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and tachychardia. Precautions are to be taken while administering the medication. Patients suffering from this debilitating condition are to be provided with customized nursing care so that individualized needs of the patients are met. There immense potential for new research on Parkinsons disease in the future especially related to pharmacological management.

What Happens When You Have Someone Write Your College Essay For UCC and Get Triggered

What Happens When You Have Someone Write Your College Essay For UCC and Get TriggeredDid you know that your school may be using an online screening tool to help them determine if you have had someone write your college essay for UCC and get flagged by the website? If so, the school may have chosen to use this system to screen students that have been flagged because they received high grades.The purpose of the system is to determine if a student has had anyone write their test questions for them and get flagged. If so, then the student can be put on a watch list. A student can be put on a watch list when the school believes that they are cheating or using software to help them improve their grades.The parent and student do not know whether or not the student was able to answer test questions for themselves or was flagged and later allowed to retake the test. This is not in the best interest of the school and could allow students to write their own tests and be recognized for a higher grade, but not be on the student's transcript if they were eventually caught.For example, when a student takes a test, they write their own test questions and will not be flagged for trying to have someone write their test questions for them. This does not mean that the student did not take the test or that the student did not write their own test questions. It simply means that the student is writing the test questions themselves and would not be flagged by the website for having someone write their test questions for them.Students that have low grades and receive better grades may be considered for scholarships. If the student gets a lot of scholarships and is able to go to college, the student may even be able to pay for their entire tuition with scholarships. They may get more scholarships than the student's first scholarship because the student earned it through hard work andan outstanding academic performance.If a student can get a lot of scholarships, but they are being flagg ed because they received high grades, then the student is not getting any of the scholarships. The student may have the best grades, but the student may not be getting any of the scholarships. The student may even end up not being able to afford their tuition.I had someone write my college essay for UCC and got flagged. The student was actually allowed to take the test, but was not allowed to write their own test questions. The student was able to retake the test, but was not allowed to answer their own test questions.The student was able to get a lot of scholarships because the student had the best grades, but the student may not be able to get any of the scholarships that the student earned because the student earned them through hard work and an outstanding academic performance. It is possible that the student may have been able to earn the scholarships but may not have been able to answer their own test questions.

Essay Topics on Reverse Discrimination - Consider it Before You Take Your Assignments

Essay Topics on Reverse Discrimination - Consider it Before You Take Your AssignmentsEssay topics on reverse discrimination may not be a primary concern of most professors, but you should be aware that they are the most important of all the essay topics to write. If your professor asks you to write an essay on this topic, do it! Doing so will show that you understand the potential value of the topic and also that you are willing to work hard to make the point.The reason for this is because you can actually be penalized severely for bringing up the topic of discrimination in your essay. This is something that can get you into trouble at college and it is even a violation of the student code of conduct. Therefore, you must address the topic of discrimination on this topic before you ever submit your paper.The idea behind using essay topics on reverse discrimination is that you are placing yourself at a disadvantage. It is true that such a topic is common knowledge in this particular su bject, but in order to really make your point, you must address the topic in depth. If you don't want to do this, then by all means, leave the topic out of your essay.But if you want to get a good grade for the assignment, then do this! The reason is because your grade depends on the content of your essay. A higher grade can be earned by addressing the topic correctly.Why would you use essay topics on reverse discrimination? Well, as previously mentioned, there are plenty of examples of essays on this topic and as a result, you are going to find it is quite easy to bring up this important issue.However, the concept is going to be extremely common sense. You may not want to use such a topic because you don't feel that you have the ability to make the point on your own. Even if you donot feel this way, there are plenty of others who do and that's why this is such a powerful essay topic.The reason that the issue is so important is because of the negative results of discrimination. The world is much better than it was 100 years ago. That being said, it is a fact that we are seeing people being discriminated against simply because of their race or gender.If you feel like this is the case, you should try to figure out how to incorporate this information into your essay. You might not be able to use this information, but it certainly doesn't mean that you cannot use it in the proper context in your essay.

Research Paper Topics For Cyber Security

Research Paper Topics For Cyber SecurityWhen applying for a bachelor's degree in information technology or a master's program in cyber-security, it is important to ensure that you choose the right research paper topics for cyber security. There are many different topics that you can use when preparing a research paper and finding the right one can be tricky, especially if you are not very familiar with cyber security, but the right paper topics will make your application much more interesting and successful.Most academic literature on cyber security will have various research paper topics. Some of these topics include vulnerabilities of systems that are connected to the internet, intellectual property theft, internet hackers, intelligence related issues, and the use of new technologies for cybersecurity. Research papers on these topics will be grouped into several themes. An example of this would be a study on the similarities and differences between insider threats and malware attac ks.While each of these topics has its own unique style, they all share one thing in common; that is, they all involve using the internet. This is where the paper topics for cyber security will differ from academic literature. Your research paper topic for cyber security will depend on the types of internet research activities that you engage in.There are two types of internet research, those that utilize networking devices and those that utilize the internet itself. In networking research, the researcher will look into the technical aspects of how certain types of equipment work. This includes the way they connect to the internet, the number of cables that need to be connected, and the equipment that connect to the internet. The researcher will also look at how long it takes to connect to the internet, the number of websites that the equipment needs to connect to, and how the equipment works when there is more than one internet connection on the same computer.On the other hand, when researching the internet itself, you can use any type of internet research. You can look at the technologies used by hackers to break into the internet; you can look at the ways that the internet has affected society in general, or you can look at the ways that internet usage has changed. There are all kinds of reasons why internet research is done, but you can choose a topic based on the types of research you want to do. For example, if you are interested in research on how new technologies affect society, you can look at how new technologies have been used by society.When choosing your topic, you can also use the current trends of the technology that you are researching on. For example, some people will focus on how cybersecurity can be used to reduce terrorism, while others will use it to protect civil liberties. In addition, you can look at how technology is used in the workplace, and how it is used in the social media world. Each of these topics can have its own focus and bene fit to your research paper.Researching your topic for cyber security can be fun and exciting. Using research paper topics for cyber security can help to make your research paper very appealing and compelling. These are just a few tips on researching your topic for cyber security, so keep the following in mind:

A Changed Man Essay Example

A Changed Man Essay A Changed Man Christian McDaniel Mrs. Rush English 10 17 October 2013 A Changed man A man trapped in a dystopian world where people are forced to obey certain laws he is told to follow. Some may struggle to get away from what they want to teach while most will follow the leader who tells them what they should be. These people are trapped in a society that forces them to act on the terms that they give. People are basically forced to be a mindless zombie that has not have a say so in what happens in the society. In the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is a perfect xample of a dystopian world with people who follow it and the others who want to escape from it. A man named Montag is the main character or protagonist of the story. In this story it is the twenty-fourth century and books have been banned by the society from ever being read. In this era of time Montag is known as a firemen but not the one most people would think of. Instead of putting out fires the firemen are there to start them. The firemens main Job is to burn all books. We will write a custom essay sample on A Changed Man specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on A Changed Man specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on A Changed Man specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Montag is at first one of the many people who are sucked into a world they dont understand but never ask questions to clear things up. Although Montag undertakes in a callous, apathetic, and weak- minded stage at first, he starts to see the truth behind his world and pushed to recognize the real problems in his world. Montag was a happy man at first. He had a home, a Job that required him to burn books and a wife, Mildred. Montag was about to be promoted after 10 years of firefighting by his captain, Beatty. Clarisse is the first initial spark to set off Montags mind. Do you ever read any of the books you laughed. Thats against the Of course (Bradbury 8). This is what Montag and Clarisse talk about that causes Montag to actually think for once. Clarisse seemed to have different feelings for Montag than the other firefighters she tried to talk to. He found her peculiar but she had a point to what she was saying. She may have looked 17 but to Montag her words made her seem much older. It was Clarisses last question that got Montag really frustrated. Are you happy? (Bradbury 14). This made Montag really think about whether or not he was really providential with not only himself but in his time and way of life. Montag was extremely confused and thought maybe the answers were somewhere he never looked before like a book. This was Montags next big step in many more dangerous ones. After one of his raids to burn some books he took one home and hid it under his pillow. The next day Beatty suddenly appeared to visit Montag at home. A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon (Bradbury 58). This is how Beatty explains to Montag how books are really bad. Beatty feels that the world is better off without the books interrupting and ruining your day. He sees it as a burden to read them. Montag still had a melancholy tendency in him; still not satisfied with himself he keeps searching for answers. Montag then took an even bigger step then before. He showed his wife and explained hat he was unhappy. Mildred did not take this lightly. She was immediately startled and afraid of them and wanted them to be gone. Listen. Give me a second, will you? We cant do anything. We cant burn these. I want to look at them, at least look at them once (Bradbury 70). Without Mildred Montag started reading the books that he had taken. Later in the book Montag meets a man named Faber who he thinks may be the answer to his problems. We have everything we need to be happy, but we arent happy. Somethings missing (Bradbury 82) Faber gives Montag his address. Montag meets Faber at his house to discuss what he should really do. If there were no war, if there was peace in the world, Id say fine, have fun! But, Montag, you mustnt go back to being Just a fireman. All isnt well with the world (Bradbury 87) Faber doesnt tell Montag what he has to do but tells him he has to make the choice himself. He can choose to part of those who know they are alive or be the people who follow what they are told to do. Montag agreed to follow Faber and his ways. Faber gave Montag a seashell-like communication device and said that he would read to him every night. Following this event Montag went home where Mildred had some friends over. Montag went on to read them a book. After awhile and when he was finally done Mildreds friends were deeply disturbed by the book. Mildred was frustrated with Montag and the books and said she wanted them gone but Montag said that he needed them. The worst of Montags misfortune was yet to come. Montag was at work and the alarm to burn some books had gone off. Montag went through the same procedures he always went through. They got on the truck and they were off. Montag had no clue where they were going. When the truck had finally stopped Montag realized where they were. Why, said Montag slowly, weve stopped in front of my house (Bradbury 113). Montag for a long while thought to himself. He couldnt believe that he was in front of his house. He didnt even say a word while Beatty, who seemed to be somewhat satisfied, went on giving a speech on how he messed up. But Montag noticed that Mildred was leaving the house to get into the car. Mildred, you didnt put in the alarm! (Bradbury 116). Mildred left the scene and never returned. Beatty told Montag that he had to burn down his own house and that he would be arrested afterward. Montag proceeded to burn everything down. When he was finished Montag and Beatty got in a little altercation and Montag ended up hooting Beatty with the flamethrower and killing him. Montag knew he had to escape the area before the cops could get to him so he had to flee somewhere. When he was running Montag decided he better go to Fabers house for advice and he was the last person he could trust. Faber told him he had to make it to the forest. Montag was successful in making it to the forest and escaping the cops. Montag began feeling, touching, and overall understanding the area around him and realized something. He walked on the track. OAnd he was surprised to learn how certain he suddenly was of a single fact he could not prove. nce, long ago, Clarisse had walked here, where he was walking now (Bradbury 147). Montag had finally felt different feeling than what he had at the beginning of the book. Montag really has become a changed man. Montag made choices that werent in his best intentions but he was a new and better person. It may seem like he lost everything but he has gained something more important than any item in the world and that is his own logic. His opinion. His ordeal. The choices he made, he made on his own and no one else can take that from him. Montag now knows that he is alive and he is proud to know this.

Edible Glowing Blood Slime

Edible Glowing Blood Slime What couldnt Halloween costume or party benefit from some blood slime? This particular slime is also edible, non-sticky and glows blue-white under a black light. Its easy to make! Glowing Blood Slime Materials 1 teaspoon soluble fiber (e.g., Metamucil)8 ounces (1 cup) diet tonic water red food coloring Make the Slime! Stir the fiber into the tonic water.Add a drop or two of food coloring. The slime gets darker during preparation, so dont add too much food coloring.Heat the liquid in a microwave-safe container until it boils. Depending on your microwave power this may be anywhere from 1-4 minutes. When the mixture boils, pause the microwave and stir the slime.Cook the microwave another 1-2 minutes. Stir it.Repeat the cooking/stirring cycle a total of 4-5 times, until the slime develops a gelatinous consistency. Carefully remove the slime from the microwave. The container will be very hot!Let the slime cool before you handle it. You can play with it, decorate with it, or even eat it. No matter what color you made your slime, it will glow blue-white under a black light or ultraviolet light. The glow is fluorescence from the quinine in the tonic water.Store your slime in a sealed bowl or plastic bag. If you are just decorating with it, its fine at room temperature, but if you plan on putting the slime in your mouth, its a good idea to refrigerate leftovers. While the slime wont stick to most surfaces, the food coloring will cause it to stain fabrics and skin. Clean up slime with soap and water. Your favorite stain remover will take out the food coloring. Watch a video of this project.