Circulatory System Essay

His first bespeak criticised Paleys simile of the squ be up. The first part of the analogy claimed that if you found a vibrate while walking through a heath, you would not think eachthing of it. However, if you had seen a consume you would examine it and find that it had moving parts that demonstrate that the watch has a purpose, the parts work together for a purpose and they are ordered to make the watch function be start if they werent, the watch wont perform its function. He concluded the first part of his analogy by look that the watch had a maker who must have existed at some time and place.The second part of the analogy claimed that if we suppose the watch had another imaginary function, and this function was the producing of other watches, then our admiration for the horologer would be increased. He concluded this part of his subscriber line by saying that anyone who finds such a watch would conclude that the fancy of the watch implies the movement of intelligence an d disposition. Paley verbalize that just like the watch world designed necessitates a room decorator as an news report of its existence, all of personality requires a much greater designer. The complexity of nature is far greater than any machine human worlds post make and therefore a gramme designer is needed, this designer is beau ideal. Hume criticised this point by saying that the analogy is limited. For cause, you could conclude from a study of the human blood circulative constitution that animals had the same system. This would be a weak and mistaken analogy barely to compare a humans and an animals circulatory system to the way sap circulates in a plant.Hume maintained his reproval of Paleys analogy of the watch by an analogy of his own. This analogy said that we can conclude that a house had a builder and an architect but we cannot, however, deduce a builder or architect of the population in the same way because there is no similarity between the two. He men tioned that if the house is faulty, what does this suggest to the highest degree the designer? And so, if God did design the world, is hedirectly responsible for the evil within it? Paley, however, rejected this point because the issue was whether the universe exhibited signs of design. He was not concerned with questions relating to issues of quality concerning the design. Paleys response was criticised to be unsatisfactory.Hume argued that there are other possible explanations than God for apparent design in the universe. Hume claimed that one of these possible explanations index be that as well as the possibility that there is a grand designer of the universe, it is equally possible that matter may contain the mold of order originally within itself, as well as mind does and that unless there is perfect similarity between the object of comparison and what is being compared, you cannot draw a conclusion with any certainty.Another possible explanation for apparent design in the universe might be that any impressions that we observe in nature may be caused by a variety of causes. This view supports the discovery of natural selection and the deoxyribonucleic acid and its role of shaping the growth of all living organisms.Hume claimed that there might not be just one single designer for the world. For example, we may look at a great ship and think about the great design of it, but the ship may be the depart of years, even generations of trial and error. The ship may be the product of some hands and not just one great designer. From this, Hume concludes that there is no evidence to suggest the unity of the deity.Hume suggested three more theories as explanations for the design of the universe aptness of analogy, the epicurean thesis and the argument from effect to cause.The aptness of analogy said that a watch is not a suitable analogy for the world. For example, just because a cabbage is fitted together/designed perfectly, does not mean that it has a make r/designer. By using a machine as an analogy, you would have already determined the outcome you postulate you want there to be a designer and youre already assuming that something natural, i.e. the cabbage, has a designer.The epicurean thesis was explained using an example. This example rundle about particles and said that if they were freely moving around over blank time, by chance, one of the combinations they make would just happen to represent a stable order and this stable order is what we now live in. This example represented the view that the universe might have happened by chance.The argument from effect to cause claimed that we cannot go from an effect to a greater cause than that needed to produce the cause. We cannot say whether he made the watch only if or had some little helpers. This would mean that we do not and cannot cognise whether he is still active or even still alive, we can only say if the universe does/doesnt have a designer and cant list its traits by sa ying that he is benevolent, omnipotent, all-knowing and infinite as many would portray him.Overall, Hume criticises the teleological argument in a number of ways. He very explicitly criticises Paleys views on the teleological argument, using them to explain why he believes that the argument is deeply flawed.